|
NO. |
Source |
Findings |
Root of the Problem |
Follow-up |
RTM Document |
Status |
|
1. |
1. Lecturers
have not compiled a rubric for UTS assessment |
RPS has been
systemized with digital validation |
Developing
the rubric for the mid-term test |
Fullfilled |
||
|
2. |
1. Lecturers
have not determined the technical implementation of online shows chat / FGD
(platform) 2. UTS score
results have not been announced back to students |
Not finished
correcting |
Using the WA
group to announce lessons and Using the WA group to announce lessons. announced the
results of the mid-term test |
Fullfilled |
||
|
3. |
UTS score
results have not been announced back to students (no evidence yet) |
Not finished
correcting |
Evaluate and
socialize S2 Educational Management lecturers to announce assessment results
to students. |
Fullfilled |
||
|
4. |
Regular
Class: 1. The RPS
does not yet contain information about the latest teaching materials 2. Lecturers
do not have teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides,
training, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. 3. Lecturers
have not assessed participation 4. UTS
results have not been submitted to students International
Class 1. Lecturers
have not submitted learning contracts to students 2. Lecturers
only use English 10 - 20% |
Regular
Class: 1. no RPS
update has been done 2. Incomplete
teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides, training,
modules or textbooks written by lecturers. 3. Still in
note form 4. Have not
finished correcting the midterm exam International
Class 1. Lack of
administrative order 2. Lecturers
need to attend English language training |
Regular
Class: 1. Complete
the RPS that contains information about the latest teaching materials 2. Lecturers
complete teaching materials in the form of hand-outs, power point slides,
training, modules or textbooks written by the lecturer. 3. Grading
participation 4. Submit
test results to students International
Class 1. Lecturer
hands over the learning contract to students 2. Provide
English language training to lecturers |
Fullfilled |
||
|
5. |
1. In regular
classes, the results of the mid-term test have not been handed back to
students 2. In
international classes lecturers use 15% English 3. In
international classes, assignments are not yet organized in English. |
1. Not
finished correcting 2. Lack of
English language skills 3. Lecturers'
inaccuracy in preparing assignments |
1. Close 2. Appeal
letter to the lecturer 3. Close |
Fullfilled |
||
|
6. |
1. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignments given to students 2. Lecturers
have not returned graded assignments to students 3. UTS score
results have not been announced back to students 4. Lecturers
have not compiled the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS 5.
Assignments and exam questions have not been prepared in English 5. |
1. Not
finished correcting 2. Not
finished correcting 3. Not
finished correcting 4. Lack of
discipline of lecturers in writing UTS UAS questions 5. UPM's
inaccuracy in validating assignments and questions 5. |
1. Grading
the assignments given to students 2. Return
graded assignments to students 3. Return UTS
results to students 4. Lecturers
compile the rubric for the assessment of UTS and UAS 5. Develop
assignments and exam questions using English. |
Fullfilled |
||
|
7. |
1. In
international classes lecturers use 50% English |
Lack of
lecturers' ability to speak English |
1. Lecturer
uses 50% English 2. Make a
monitoring and evaluation report |
Fullfilled |
||
|
8. |
Regular Class 1. RPS has
not been designed and developed by lecturers independently/group according to
the development of science and technology with Team-based Project and Case
Method models. 2. RPS has
not been validated by the science clump team 3. The
developed RPS has been approved by the Koorprodi 4. RPS has
contained learning outcomes according to KKNI which consists of knowledge,
attitudes, general skills and special skills 5. Lecturers
have not returned graded assignments to students. 6. Lecturers
have not compiled a rubric for UTS assessment 7. UTS score
results are announced back to students International
Class 1.
Assignments and exam questions have not been prepared in English. 2. UTS
results have not been handed back to students 3. RPS is not
yet bilingual 4. Teaching
materials are not yet bilingual |
Regular: 1. In the
transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 2. Clump team
not yet authorized by the faculty 3. In the
transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 4. In the
transition period of preparing the old format RPS to the OBE format 5. Not
finished correcting 6. Lecturers'
indiscipline in compiling questions 7. Not
finished correcting International: 1. UPM's
inaccuracy in validating questions 2. Not
finished correcting 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing the RPS 5. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing teaching materials 5. |
Regular Class 1. Develop
RPS designed and developed by lecturers independently/group according to the
development of science and technology with Team-based Project and Case Method
models. 2. Validating
the RPS by the science clump team 3. The
developed RPS has been approved by the Koorprodi 4. Develop
RPS that contains learning outcomes according to KKNI consisting of
knowledge, attitudes, general skills and special skills. 5. Return
graded assignments to students. 6. Develop a
rubric for UTS assessment 7. Return the
results of the midterm exam and announce them to the students. International
Class 1. Develop
assignments and exam questions using English. 2. Submit
test results to students 3. Develop a
bilingual SSP 4. Developing
bilingual teaching materials |
Fullfilled |
||
|
9. |
1. RPS has
not been validated by science clusters 2. RPS does
not yet contain teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years
and from the results of research and PKM 3. RPS is not
yet bilingual 4. Lecturers
have not assessed participation 5. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignment 6. Lecturers
have not returned assignments to students 7. Lecturers
have not developed an assessment rubric 8. UTS
results have not been returned |
1. Cluster
team not yet established 2. Has not
updated the RPS 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing the RPS 4. still in
the form of notes 5. still
being corrected 6. still
being corrected 7. Lecturer
indiscipline 8. still
being corrected |
1. Validating
the RPS by the science clump team 2. Revise the
RPS that contains teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years
and from the results of research and PKM 3. Develop a
bilingual SSP 4. Grading
participation 5. Grading
the assignment 6. Returning
assignments to students 7. Develop
assessment rubric 8. Returning
UTS Results |
Fullfilled |
||
|
10. |
1. RPS has
not been validated by science clusters 2. RPS does
not yet contain teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years
and from the results of research and PKM 3. RPS is not
yet bilingual 4. Lecturers
have not assessed participation 5. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignment 6. Lecturers
have not returned assignments to students 7. Lecturers
have not developed an assessment rubric 8. UTS
results have not been returned |
1. Cluster
team not yet established 2. Has not
updated the RPS 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing the RPS 4. still in
the form of notes 5. still
being corrected 6. still
being corrected 7. Lecturer
indiscipline 8. still
being corrected |
1. Validating
the RPS by the science clump team 2. Revise the
RPS that contains teaching materials that are up-to-date in the last 10 years
and from the results of research and PKM 3. Develop a
bilingual SSP 4. Grading
participation 5. Grading
the assignment 6. Returning
assignments to students 7. Develop
assessment rubric 8. Returning
UTS Results |
Fullfilled |
||
|
11. |
Introduction
to Microeconomics 1. Lecturer
has not returned the assignment 2. Lecturers
have not provided an assessment of the assignments given to students 3. Lecturers
have not developed rubrics 4. Lecturer
has not submitted UTS 5.
Assignments and Exam Questions have not been prepared in English. |
1. Not
finished correcting 2. Lecturers'
indiscipline in conducting assessments 3. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing questions that are complete with the assessment
rubric 4. Not
finished correcting 5. UPM's
inaccuracy in validating questions 5. |
Introduction
to Microeconomics 1. Returning
the task 2. provide
assessment of assignments given to students 3. Develop
Rubric 4. Submitting
test results 5. Develop
assignments and exam questions using English. 4. Make a
report on the instrument and BA of the International Economics course and the
instrument of the Introduction to Business course. |
Fullfilled |
||
|
12. |
1. There is
no UTS assessment rubric yet 2. Has not
submitted proof of submission of UTS grades 3. Lecturers
do not have teaching materials 4. Lecturers
use English 10-15% 5. UTS
results have not been submitted to students |
1. Lecturers'
indiscipline in preparing questions that are complete with the assessment
rubric 2. Not
finished correcting 3. Lecturer
relies too much on student presentation materials 4. Lack of
lecturers' ability to speak English 5. Not
finished correcting |
1. Develop a
rubric for UTS assessment 2. submit
proof of submission of UTS scores 3. Develop
teaching materials 4. Use
English 10-15% 5. Submit
test results to students |
Fullfilled |
|
Yes |
Description
of Findings |
Study Program |
Improvement
Plan |
Repair
Schedule |
|
1. |
a.
Curriculum restructuring is made
with b.
make documents formally however c.
need to be verified by the
leadership and d.
Faculty Senate
e.
The study program has a mechanism
in the form of f.
Regular reviews of profiles g.
graduates equivalent to the
duration of the curriculum, h.
However, for 2023 there has been
no report i.
Tracer Studies
j.
Study programs do not conduct CPL
assessments for k.
Year Running Force
l.
The RPS is not fully updated in
accordance with m.
OBE implementation components
n.
Study programs do not conduct CPL
assessments o.
for the current year, while p.
PEO achievement has not been done
yet |
S1 Psychology |
a. Will
confirm immediately Restructuring
documents Curriculum by
Leadership Faculty b. Create a
tracer report Study c. Conducting
assessments Curriculum d. Upgrading
RPS |
May to June |
|
2. |
a.
SKP, but the study program has not
been given the right b.
to conduct the selection of new
lecturers c.
Education and SOPs related to
intolerance d.
already exists, but the guidelines
do not yet exist |
S1 BK Study
Program |
Creating
guidelines and SOPs related to intolerance |
May 2024 |
|
3. |
a.
The study program has not held b.
International seminars c.
Increased recognition of
Scientific works d.
Lecturers who are indexed by
SCOPUS have not yet e.
reach 80% f.
There is no PS lecturer who has
become a g.
members of organizations
International level h.
There is no K3 policy yet i.
There are no mood guidelines yet j.
Academics and Intolerance |
S1 MP Study
Program |
Organizes International
Seminars
Increase in
scientific work lecturer
Creating K3
guidelines and Academic
guidelines |
June 2024 |
|
4. |
a.
Academic freedom guidelines b.
still using the decree of 2015 c.
ACQUIN accreditation process is ongoing |
Prodi S1 PG- Early
Childhood Education |
Completing
the ACQUIN documents |
June 2024 |
|
5. |
a.
Curriculum restructuring is made
with b.
Making Academics Officially Not
Authorized by the Faculty Leadership and Senate c.
There are no results of evaluation
of the study of KKNI material and international level associations d.
There has been no 10 percent
increase in DTPS getting recognition abroad e.
There are no PS lecturers who are
international members f.
ACQUIN accreditation process is
ongoing |
S1 PLS Study
Program |
Create a
document academic and
accredited leader
Elevate
recognition abroad
Complete the
documents ACQUIN |
May 2024 |
|
6. |
a.
Lack of completeness of the PGSD
laboratory |
S1 PGSD Study
Program |
Equipping
PGSD LAB facilities |
May 2024 |
|
7. |
a.
Periodic evaluations have been
carried out related to PLO and the duration of the curriculum, but the
documents are still incomplete b.
An evaluation of the curriculum
review has been carried out per year, but the documents are still incomplete c.
Tracer studies have been carried
out, but the instruments are not complete and there has been no increase in
the number of lecturers d.
Keeping up with exchanges at home
and abroad |
PLB Study
Program |
Complete PLO
documents
Conducting an
evaluation Curriculum
Review
Create a tracer
report Study |
May-June 2024 |
|
8. |
a.
Curriculum restructuring is made
by making documents officially and ratified by faculty leaders b.
The study program has a mechanism
in the form of periodic reviews of graduate profiles equivalent to the
duration of the curriculum, but for 2023 c.
No Tracer Study Report Yet d.
The evaluation is carried out
through SKP, but the study program has not been given the right to conduct a
selection of new lecturers |
TP Study
Program |
Authenticate
documents Curriculum by
Leadership Faculty
Creating a
review SOP Curriculum |
May |
The
conclusion of the audit results is as follows:
After
conducting an RTM, the international accreditation audit of the study program
will carry out follow-up and improvements to meet quality standards.
The
plan to solve problems and findings is for the period of January to December
2024.
